<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Moog Voyager / Minimonsta comparison</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rhythminmind.net/presetblog/2009/05/moog-voyager-minimonsta-comparison/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rhythminmind.net/presetblog/2009/05/moog-voyager-minimonsta-comparison/</link>
	<description>Audio processing tools &#38; information.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:29:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: rhythminmind</title>
		<link>http://www.rhythminmind.net/presetblog/2009/05/moog-voyager-minimonsta-comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-2494</link>
		<dc:creator>rhythminmind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 14:44:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rhythminmind.net/presetblog/?p=557#comment-2494</guid>
		<description>Minimonsta is closer to the Model D for sure.  I have found if I set the Voyager resonance to &quot;2&quot; the wave shapes are near identical between the two. I just added some new pic&#039;s to show the results. All in all it&#039;s noway a measure of quality. The Voyager, Model D, &amp; Minimonsta can all make great moogesk sounds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Minimonsta is closer to the Model D for sure.  I have found if I set the Voyager resonance to &#8220;2&#8243; the wave shapes are near identical between the two. I just added some new pic&#8217;s to show the results. All in all it&#8217;s noway a measure of quality. The Voyager, Model D, &#038; Minimonsta can all make great moogesk sounds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurent [Ohm Farce]</title>
		<link>http://www.rhythminmind.net/presetblog/2009/05/moog-voyager-minimonsta-comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-2493</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurent [Ohm Farce]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 14:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rhythminmind.net/presetblog/?p=557#comment-2493</guid>
		<description>Please note that the Minimonsta was modelled after an original Minimoog, not a Moog Voyager. You&#039;ll find here some oscillator recordings of the Minimoog on which the Minimonsta is based on :
http://ldesoras.free.fr/audio/minimoog-samples.zip

Also: the square wave of our Minimoog was not exactly square (PW a bit off), and it seems that the various Minimoog out there have the same behaviour, but with different pulse width inaccuracies. Anyway we deliberately chose to emulate it with a PW of exactly 50 %.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please note that the Minimonsta was modelled after an original Minimoog, not a Moog Voyager. You&#8217;ll find here some oscillator recordings of the Minimoog on which the Minimonsta is based on :<br />
<a href="http://ldesoras.free.fr/audio/minimoog-samples.zip" rel="nofollow">http://ldesoras.free.fr/audio/minimoog-samples.zip</a></p>
<p>Also: the square wave of our Minimoog was not exactly square (PW a bit off), and it seems that the various Minimoog out there have the same behaviour, but with different pulse width inaccuracies. Anyway we deliberately chose to emulate it with a PW of exactly 50 %.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moog Voyager vs. Minimonsta:Melohman &#171; The OHM Side of the Moon &#8211; Ohm Force Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.rhythminmind.net/presetblog/2009/05/moog-voyager-minimonsta-comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-2491</link>
		<dc:creator>Moog Voyager vs. Minimonsta:Melohman &#171; The OHM Side of the Moon &#8211; Ohm Force Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 08:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rhythminmind.net/presetblog/?p=557#comment-2491</guid>
		<description>[...] listen with your own ears: rhythminmind from the &#8220;Signal to Noize&#8221; blog posted an in-depth comparison between the real Moog Voyager hardware synth and our Minimonsta:Melohman virtual instrument. Listen [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] listen with your own ears: rhythminmind from the &#8220;Signal to Noize&#8221; blog posted an in-depth comparison between the real Moog Voyager hardware synth and our Minimonsta:Melohman virtual instrument. Listen [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TripACT</title>
		<link>http://www.rhythminmind.net/presetblog/2009/05/moog-voyager-minimonsta-comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-2465</link>
		<dc:creator>TripACT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 16:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rhythminmind.net/presetblog/?p=557#comment-2465</guid>
		<description>very nice job! interesting indeed!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very nice job! interesting indeed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LM</title>
		<link>http://www.rhythminmind.net/presetblog/2009/05/moog-voyager-minimonsta-comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-2458</link>
		<dc:creator>LM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 05:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rhythminmind.net/presetblog/?p=557#comment-2458</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the test, It is a big suprise how big the difrence is when I listen to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the test, It is a big suprise how big the difrence is when I listen to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
